Ecologists find 2008 earthquake destroyed nearly a quarter of panda habitat near quake’s epicenter
When the magnitude 8 Sichuan earthquake struck southern China in May 2008, it left more than 69,000 people dead and 4.3 million homeless. Now ecologists have added to these losses an assessment of the earthquake’s impact on biodiversity: namely, habitat for some of the last existing wild giant pandas. In an article published today in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment e-view, researchers show that more than 23 percent of the pandas’ habitat in the study area was destroyed, and fragmentation of the remaining habitat could hinder panda reproduction.
The Sichuan region is designated as one of 25 global hotspots for biodiversity conservation, according to a 2000 study. Home to more than 12,000 species of plants and 1122 species of vertebrates, the area includes more than half of the habitat for the Earth’s wild giant panda population, says study lead author Weihua Xu of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing.
“We estimate that above 60 percent of the wild giant panda population was affected to some extent by the earthquake,” says Xu.
In an effort to develop conservation strategies for the panda’s remaining habitat, Xu and his colleagues used satellite imagery, field observations and published research to determine the pandas’ habitat loss and fragmentation in the South Minshan region, which is adjacent to the earthquake’s epicenter. Since forests are the main vegetation type used by the pandas, the authors compared forested areas in satellite images from September 2007, before the earthquake, to images after the earthquake and its aftershocks, in July 2008.
The authors then combined results based on these satellite data with criteria that make forests suitable for pandas, including elevation, slope incline and presence of bamboo. Their analyses revealed that more than 354 square kilometers, or about 23 percent, of the pandas’ habitat was converted to bare land. Of the remaining habitat, the researchers found that large habitat areas had been fragmented into smaller, disconnected patches, which Xu says can be just as harmful as habitat destruction.
“It is probable that habitat fragmentation has separated the giant panda population inhabiting this region, which could be as low as 35 individuals,” says Xu. “This kind of isolation increases their risk of extinction in the wild, due in part to a higher likelihood of inbreeding.”
Xu and his colleagues propose a plan to encourage pandas to move between patches using specially protected corridors. They also recommend areas to be protected outside of nature reserves, where the earthquake caused more than twice as much damage to panda habitat as inside reserves. Finally, they recommend that post-earthquake relocation of affected towns takes panda habitat into consideration.
“It is vital to the survival of this species that measures are taken to protect panda habitat outside nature reserves,” Xu says. “Giant pandas in this region are more vulnerable than ever to human disturbance, including post-earthquake reconstruction and tourism. When coupled with these increasing human activities, natural disasters create unprecedented challenges for biodiversity conservation.”