Federal Budget Tracker
ESA’s Federal Budget Tracker monitors the federal appropriations process and provides information on budgets relevant to ecological sciences. It will be updated as new appropriations information becomes available.
Click on the buttons below to jump to funding information, including budget tables, for a specific federal department or agency.
This budget tracker covers the Fiscal Year 2020 (FY 2020) budget. The federal government runs on a fiscal year from Oct.1-Sept. 30.
Appropriators are currently working to determine the federal budget for FY 2020.
The House Appropriations Committee has passed all 12 appropriations bills out of committee and the full House has passed ten out of 12 appropriations bills.
As of mid-September 2019, the Senate Appropriations Committee is releasing its spending bills.
President Trump and congressional leaders announced July 22 that they have reached a deal to raise the debt ceiling, boost discretionary spending and permanently end sequestration, the mandatory, across the board cuts required by the Budget Control Act of 2011. The agreement raises defense spending by three percent and non-discretionary defense spending, which includes funding for most science agencies, by 4.5 percent.
The federal budget is composed of discretionary spending and mandatory spending. Discretionary spending accounts for 27% of the total budget and funds the military and federal agencies. Congress determines the discretionary spending limits. Mandatory spending accounts for 73% of the total budget that primarily funds Medicare, Social Security and payment on the national debt and is set by law.
Through the federal appropriations process, Congress sets discretionary spending and allocates money to federal agencies and programs. The appropriations process is a multi-step process that involves agency budget requests, the President’s Budget, House and Senate Appropriations Committees and Subcommittees, hearings, annual budget resolutions bills, and twelve spending bills. These appropriations bills must be enacted prior to the start of the government’s fiscal year (Oct. 1-Sept.30). However, Congress often has often been unable to complete appropriations before the new fiscal year begins and used Continuing Resolutions to extend funding for agencies at current-year levels to avoid a government shutdown.
FY 2020 Appropriations:
President Trump released his Fiscal Year 2020 budget, “A Budget for a Better America,” on March 11.
The House passed 10 out of 12 required appropriations bills in June, including increases for most ecological science agencies (see Policy News, July 1, 2019), using a budget agreement that increased nondefense discretionary spending by 6% and increased defense spending by 2%. An agreement that increases non-defense discretionary spending by 4.5% means that final spending levels for non-defense discretionary programs will likely be lower than the amounts specified in the House bills, but the House bills will serve as a starting point for negotiations with Senate appropriators. The Senate began its appropriations work in September 2019.
Both the House and Senate passed a continuing resolution keeping the government funded at FY 2019 levels through Nov. 21.
Status of FY 2020 Appropriations Bills
|Passed Senate Appropriations Committee|
Passed full House
Energy and Water Development
Financial Services and General Government
Labor-Health and Human Service-Education
Military Construction and Veterans Administration
Not yet released
State and Foreign Operations
Transportation and Housing and Urban Development
|Passed Senate Appropriations Committee|
FY 2019 Appropriations:
President Trump released his Fiscal Year 2019 budget, “Efficient, Effective, Accountable: An American Budget,” on Feb. 12. The budget includes an addendum that modifies the president’s budget to account for new cap levels that were set in the budget agreement Congress passed a few days earlier. This spending plan would lead to $3 trillion in deficit reductions over the next decade, largely through cuts to social programs and other domestic spending, while simultaneously increasing military spending and spending on other programs that would add $7 trillion to the national debt over the next ten years. Similar to the president’s FY 2018 budget, this document calls for considerable cuts to non-defense discretionary spending, with significant cuts proposed for science, research, and environmental agencies and programs.
This budget reflects the administration’s priorities across the federal government for the next fiscal year and serves as a starting point for Congress. However, it is largely an aspirational document, and it is Congress that ultimately passes the twelve appropriations bills that fund the government. The president’s proposal mainly serves as a messaging tool for the administration.
The week of September 10, the House and Senate both agreed to a conference committee report for minibus of bills passed during the summer, including appropriations for the Department of Energy. The president signed this bill September 21. Congress has also approved another spending package covering appropriations for the Departments of Defense, Health and Human Services, Labor and Education and the president signed this bill.
Congress passed a bill funding for the remaining federal agencies, including NSF, the EPA and the Departments of the Interior and Agriculture on Feb. 15, 2019.
FY 2018 Appropriations:
The FY2018 omnibus spending bill, which funds the government through September 30 2018, provides $1.21 trillion in base discretionary budget authority and $78 billion in Overseas Contingency Operations funding. Defense spending gets a 14 percent increase over FY 2017, while the other eleven appropriations bills get a combined 12 percent increase. The bill largely rejects the deep cuts to science and research that had been proposed in the president’s budget. In fact, it provides the largest increase to research spending since the 2009 economic stimulus package. It also does not include several harmful policy riders that would have rolled back environmental protections and Endangered Species Act requirements and paved the way for repeal of the Clean Water Rule.
Appropriations by Federal Agency
Discretionary spending for relevant federal agencies and programs.
- Department of Agriculture
- Department of Energy
- Department of the Interior
- Environmental Protection Agency
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- National Science Foundation
Note: The tables below compare the FY 2019 President’s Budget to FY 2017 enacted numbers.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is the federal department in charge of farming, agriculture, forestry, and food. It aims to help farmers and ranchers, promote agricultural production, work to address hunger worldwide, and preserve the nation’s natural resources through conservation, restored forests, improved watersheds, and healthy private working lands. USDA is composed of 29 agencies, including the Forest Service and the Agricultural Research Service.
FY 2020: The president’s budget proposes $20.8 billion for the USDA, a 15% decrease.
FY 2019: The FY 2019 budget allocated $19.2 billion to the Department of Agriculture, $3.5 billion less than fiscal year 2017 (a 15% decrease). Among other cuts, it proposed cutting $136 million in funding for conservation programs.
FY 2018: The president’s budget proposed a 21% cut (decrease of $4.7 billion) to USDA’s budget for FY 2018.
The Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI), housed within USDA’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), is the nation’s leading competitive grants program for agricultural sciences. AFRI grants are awarded for research, education, and extension to address challenges facing agricultural producers and systems.
The 2018 Farm Bill reauthorized AFRI and continues the authorized full funding level of $700 million through FY 2023.
The president’s budget requests an $85 million dollar increase for the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative. AFRI received $415 million in FY 2019. As a whole, NIFA receives $1.4 billion, a 6 percent cut. The request also includes $25 million to relocate NIFA and the Economic Research Service to a location outside the Washington, D.C. area.
The House appropriations bill includes $465 million for AFRI, a nearly 11 percent increase. Bill language also blocks the USDA from moving NIFA to a location outside the DC area, although the USDA aims to complete the relocation before the end of FY 2019.
The Senate appropriations bill includes $425 million for AFRI, a $10 million dollar increase. NIFA as a whole receives $1.484 billion, an increase of around 1%. This includes $25 million to relocate the agency to the Kansas City metropolitan area.
The president’s budget keeps AFRI funding flat compared to FY 2017 levels, at $375 million.
The House and Senate appropriations bills increase funding for AFRI. The House funds AFRI at $415 million and the Senate funds AFRI at $405 million.
The president’s budget proposed to cut AFRI’s budget by 7 percent to $349 million, down from $375 million. Funding for AFRI’s parent agency, the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), would be reduced to $1.2 billion, an 8 percent cut. ESA asked Congress to fund AFRI at $420 million in FY 2018.
The final omnibus bill funded NIFA at 1.4 billion, an increase of 45 million over FY2017 enacted levels. The omnibus also increases funding for AFRI to 400 million.
USDA’s Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) received a 7.1 percent increase over FY 2016 levels for a total of $375 million in FY 2017.
The Agricultural Research Service within USDA is the department’s principal research agency devoted to agricultural research and information.
The Agricultural Research Service receives $1.253 billion, a 4 percent cut, in the president’s budget request.
The House appropriations bill provides $1.394 billion for ARS, including a 3.2 percent increase for salaries and expenses. The bill includes an additional $1 million for Long-Term Agro-ecosystem Research network.
The Senate appropriations bill includes $1.424 billion for ARS.
The president’s budget cuts total ARS discretionary funding by 5% compared to FY 2017. While the original proposal cancelled $192 million for ARS Buildings & Facilities, the addendum restores this amount.
The House bill funds ARS at $1.395 billion and the Senate bill provides $1.301 billion.
The president’s budget decreases the ARS budget by 22 percent, cutting it from $1.3 billion to $993 million.
ESA asked Congress to fund ARS at $1.3 billion in FY 2018.
The omnibus bill funds ARS at $1.202 billion, a $32 million increase from FY 2017. The omnibus also rejects the president’s budget proposal to close 17 ARS research facilities.
ARS received a total budget of $1.27 billion, a decrease of $86 million from FY 2016. However, the Salaries and Expenses account within ARS, which funds research programs, received $1.17 billion, which is a 2.3 percent increase over last year’s funding.
The US Forest Service, an agency within USDA, manages 154 national forests and 20 grasslands across the country and in Puerto Rico. The Forest Service has a dual-use mandate of ensuring the health, diversity, and productivity of the lands it manages as well as sustaining their productivity. Research is a significant component of the agency’s operations, with the research and development division working in a range of biological, physical, and social science fields to promote the sustainable management of national forests. Key areas of USFS work include managing invasive species, combatting pests and disease, and ensuring healthy fish and wildlife habitats.
The Forest Service’s FY 2020 budget request includes $5.7 billion for the agency overall, a 6% cut, and $254 million for Forest Service Research and Development, a 15% cut.
The House appropriations bill includes $3.68 billion for Forest Service non-fire programs. The House bill creates a new account for Forest Service operational costs such as utilities and information technology management. With these changes, Forest Service Research and Development receives a $16 million increase, a five percent increase over FY2019 levels. The full House passed a bill funding the Forest Service in June 2019.
The Senate Appropriations bill for the Forest Service includes $3.56 billion for Forest Service non-fire programs. Senate appropriators mirror the House’s proposal to create a new Forest Service operational costs. Forest Service Research and Development receives $257.64 million — appropriators note that this is approximately a $6 million dollar increase when taking into account the new operational pool.
FY 2019: The president’s budget for FY19 would reduce the USFS budget by 10 percent. It would provide $2.5 billion to mitigate wildland fire risk, a decrease of over $300 million from FY 2017 but nearly equal to what has been proposed for FY18. It also proposes a legislative solution to establish an annual cap adjustment for wildlife suppression, similar to how other natural disasters are funded.
Other key proposals include:
- Decreasing funding to Wildlife and Fisheries Habitat Management by $20.7 million
- A decrease of $20,762,000 for watershed improvements to sustain or restore watershed function and resilience.
- A decrease of $17,782,000 to Vegetation and Watershed Management
In the House FY2019 appropriations bill, USFS receives $6.1 billion, an increase of $100 million above FY 2018 levels. This budget includes $3 billion for wildland fire prevention and suppression, $297 million for Forest Service Research and Development – a $1 million decrease from FY 2018 – and $19.5 million in new funding to combat pests, diseases and invasive species in forests.
In the Senate bill, USFS receives $6.29 billion, including $349 million in increased funding for wildland fire management. Without the wildland fire management account, the agency receives a $14.48 million increase. The Forest Service’s Research and Development program receives $300 million, a $3 million increase over FY 2018 levels.
The president’s budget would cut USFS’s budget by 10 percent, decreasing it to $4.7 billion in discretionary spending for FY 2018. Within USFS, Forest and Rangeland Research funding would be reduced 10 percent, and Wildland Fire Management funding would be cut 12 percent. It would also reduce funding for National Forest System land acquisition. As laid out in the president’s skinny budget for FY 2018, the proposal would fully fund wildfire activities at $2.4 billion, 100 percent of the 10-year average for suppression operations.
The FY2018 omnibus bill provides $6 billion for the Forest Service, with $2.8 billion directed to wildland fire prevention and suppression. This includes a $4 million decrease in funding for wildlife and fish habitat management from FY2017 levels and a $4.7 million decrease for watershed and vegetation management. The Forest and Rangeland Research program received an eight million dollar increase and is funded at $298 million.
The spending bill also includes a deal to fix the way that wildland firefighting and forest management are funded by creating an emergency pot of money for the Forest Service to use when it exceeds its fire-suppression budget. Currently, USFS must borrow from other agency accounts and use funds intended for forest management, research, and other purposes when the cost of fighting wildfire exceeds the amount budgeted for the fiscal year. The omnibus creates a $2.19 billion disaster fund for wildfires in order to end this practice. The deal includes a provision to reverse some of the effects of the Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. Forest Service case which required additional Endangered Species Act consultation for some forest management projects and another provision to create categorical exclusions from the National Environmental Policy Act for hazardous fuel reduction projects in national forests in areas of up to 3,000 acres.
The omnibus bill includes $5.6 billion for the Forest Service. More than half of this funding – $3.2 billion – is targeted to wildland fire prevention and suppression. In total and across agency budgets, the bill funds wildland firefighting and prevention programs at $4.2 billion, including $407 million in emergency funding. It fully funds the 10-year average for wildland fire suppression costs for both the Department of the Interior and the Forest Service.
USFS FY 2017 funding without wildland fire management funds is $2.42 billion, which is a $27.8 million cut from FY 2016.
The Forest and Rangeland Research program is funded at $288.5 million, which is a decrease of $2.486 million. Additionally, $3 million of this funding must now be used for the USFS contribution to the Joint Fire Science Program.
Office of Science: The Office of Science within the Department of Energy is the leading federal agency supporting scientific research for energy and the country’s largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences. The Office of Science supports research in all 50 states and the District of Columbia by providing direct support both of scientific research and of the development, construction, and operation of open-access scientific user facilities. The Office of Science consists of six scientific program offices, of which Biological and Environmental Research is one.
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE): This office serves to support the development of clean, affordable, and secure energy. Its mission is to create and sustain American leadership in the transition to a global clean energy economy.
The Department of Energy’s budget request cuts funding for the Office of Science to $5.5 billion, a 17.3% cut. Biological and Environmental Research is cut by nearly 30%. Within Biological and Environmental Research, Earth and Environmental Systems Science’s budget is cut from $139 million in FY 2019 to $93 million in FY 2020. Biological Systems Science is cut from $368 million to $327 million.
The House’s appropriations bill for the Energy Department includes $6.87 billion for the Office of Science, a 4.3% increase from FY 2019, and $2.65 billion for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, an 11.4% increase. Biological Systems Science receives $381 million, including $100 million for the Bioenergy Research Centers. The DOE’s terrestrial-aquatic interfaces pilot project receives $20 million and cloud-aerosol research receives $15 million. This bill passed the full House June 19.
The Senate appropriations bill includes $7.22 billion for the Office of Science, a 9.6% increase, and $2.86 billion for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, a 20.2% increase. Within the Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research receives $770 million, a 9.2% increase. Report language accompanying the spending bill recommends $100 million for the Bioenergy Research Centers, $45 million for terrestrial ecosystem science and $97 million for earth and environmental modeling. Senate appropriators direct the Energy Department to further invest in machine learning to understand environmental and climate dynamics, improve watershed, ecosystem and climate models and project extreme events.
The president’s FY19 budget provides nearly flat funding to DOE’s Office of Science compared to FY17. Within the Office of Science, however, the budget would cut Biological and Environmental Research from $612 million to $500 million, an 18 percent reduction. The budget would cut the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by two thirds, reducing it from $2.1 billion to $696 million. It simultaneously increases funding for Fossil Energy R&D.
As it did in FY18, the president’s budget proposes to eliminate DOE’s Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E).
On September 21, 2018, the President signed a minibus bill (H.R. 5895) including appropriations for the Department of Energy and the Office of Science. The final bill includes $6.585 for the Office of Science – a 5.2 percent increase – and $705 million for Biological and Environmental Research, a 4.8 percent increase. The bill also increases funding for the Bioenergy Research Centers by 11 percent to $100 million. Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E) also retains funding — it receives $366 million — a 3.6% increase.
The president’s budget proposed a 17 percent cut to DOE’s Office of Science $4.5 billion The budget also proposed slashing funding for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by 70% and eliminating the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy.
DOE and DOE research programs fared well in the 2018 omnibus bill. DOE Science research programs are funded at $6.26 billion, $868 million above FY 2017. The Biological and Environmental Research program is increased by $61 million for a total of $673 million. DOE’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy gets $2.3 billion, about $200 million above current funding. The Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), targeted for elimination in the president’s budget, received record funding of $353.3 million, a $47 million increase above FY 2017.
For FY 2017, the Office of Science received $5.4 billion for science research – an increase of $42 million above the FY 2016 enacted level. This funding supports basic energy research, the development of high-performance computing systems, and research into the next generation of energy sources. For the Biological and Environmental Research (BER) program, the omnibus bill provides $75 million for the three BioEnergy Research Centers and $10 million for exascale computing. DOE is urged to give priority to optimizing the operation of BER user facilities.
DOE’s EERE Office FY 2017 funding provides $20 million to support the development of the Synthetic Biology Foundry and $30 million for algal biofuels. DOE is also directed to sustain the investment in development of algal biofuels.
The Department of the Interior (DOI) is the federal department in charge of protecting and managing the majority of the country’s natural and cultural resources. It also provides scientific and other information about these resources. DOI is responsible for most federal land.
The president’s budget requests $12.5 billion for DOI, a 14 percent decrease. The budget also requests $28 million to continue work on Interior’s reorganization.
The House appropriations bill does not include funding for reorganization efforts. It also includes a provision blocking offshore drilling off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts and the eastern Gulf of New Mexico. Another amendment increased funding for the Joint Fire Science Program by $1 million to $7 million total.
The House passed a bill funding the Interior Department for FY2020 in June 2019.
Similar to last year, the president’s budget reduces DOI funding to $11.7 billion, cutting it from $13.5 billion in FY17. It also provides authority for and prioritizes a DOI-wide reorganization, proposing $17.5 million to reorganize the department into 13 regions. Another proposed change is a reduction of funding to the Land and Water Conservation Fund by 92% ($33 million).
In the president’s FY18 proposal, DOI faced an 11 percent cut to its overall budget, decreasing it to $11.7 billion.
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) within DOI manages over 247 million acres of public lands. The agency manages for multiple use, including energy development, livestock grazing, recreation, and timber harvesting, as well as for the enjoyment of present and future generations. The BLM administers a 700-million acre subsurface mineral estate and also manages the National Landscape Conservation System.
The President’s budget request includes $1.075 billion for the Bureau of Land Management, 20 percent cut from FY 2019 levels.
House appropriators include $1.4 million for the Bureau of Land Management, a 4% increase, and $73 million for sage grouse conservation, a $5 million increase over FY2019 levels.
Senate appropriators also provide 1.4 billion for the BLM.
The BLM budget for FY19 is cut by 17 percent in the president’s budget, reducing it to $1.04 billion. The budget prioritizes the administration’s commitment to American energy dominance.
The BLM receives budget increases in both the House and Senate bills. The House bill provides 1.4 million and the Senate provides $1.34 billion. The House bill includes $60 million for sage grouse conservation.
The president’s budget proposed $1.1 billion for BLM in FY 2018, a decrease of $165 million, or 13 percent, from FY 2017 enacted funding. The FY2018 omnibus bill funds the BLM at 1.3 billion, an increase of 80 million above FY2017.
The omnibus appropriations bill for FY 2017 funded BLM at $1.25 billion, an increase of $15.7 from FY 2016. It also provides an increase of almost $8.9 million for greater sage-grouse conservation. The bill funds wildlife and fisheries management at $115.8 million, nearly $14 million above FY 2016, and it provides flat funding of $21.6 million for management of threatened and endangered species.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service, an agency within DOI, provides important work in habitat conservation and endangered species protection throughout the National Wildlife Refuges, National Fish Hatcheries, fishery resource offices, and ecological services field stations under its jurisdiction. FWS also plays a vital role in interagency efforts to monitor and control the spread of invasive plant and animal species.
In the President’s Budget Request, USFWS receives $1.272 billion in appropriated funds, a 20 percent cut. Ecological Services, which administers the Endangered Species Act, receives a 4.6 percent cut. Fish and Aquatic Conservation receives a 7 percent cut. The National Wildlife Refuge System receives a 4.35 percent increase.
In the House bill, USFWS receives $1.7 billion, a 5% increase. Ecological Services receives a nearly 15% increase to administer the Endangered Species Act.
In the Senate bill, USFWS receives 1.63 million, a 3.3% increase.
The proposed FY19 budget for USFWS would reduce funding by nearly twenty percent, cutting it from $1.5 billion to $1.2 billion. The budget eliminates funding for the Science Support line item, which includes Adaptive Science and Service Science categories.
The president’s budget proposed to reduce funding for USFWS by 14 percent to $1.3 billion, down from $1.5 billion.
The FY 2018 omnibus bill funds FWS at $1.6 billion, an increase of $75 million above FY 2017. The bill directs the agency to prioritize funding to reduce the endangered species delisting backlog and refuge maintenance backlog, to fight invasive species, to prevent illegal wildlife trafficking, and to prevent the closure of fish hatcheries. It continues a one-year delay on Endangered Species Act reviews, determinations, and rulemakings for the greater sage-grouse.
The FWS is funded at $1.5 billion in FY 2017, an $11 million increase above the FY2016 enacted level. Within this amount, the legislation prioritizes funding to reduce the endangered species delisting backlog and maintenance backlog, to fight invasives species, to prevent illegal wildlife trafficking, and to prevent the closure of fish hatcheries.
The ecological services account receives a slight increase for a total of $240 million. Funding is flat for multinational species conservation, while migratory bird management received a slight increase. Adaptive and service science support is flat-funded at $16.9 million.
The omnibus bill also continues a one-year delay on any further Endangered Species Act status reviews, determinations, and rulemakings for the greater sage-grouse. The BLM budget, which is a separate agency within DOI with its own budget, provides a total of $68.9 million for greater sage-grouse conservation activities, including the implementation of the National Seed Strategy, which is an increase of $8.9 million above the FY 2016 enacted level.
The US Geological Survey, a branch of DOI, plays a critical role in monitoring and assessing environmental challenges that threaten public safety and the health of our ecosystems. USGS conducts the science necessary to manage our nation’s biological, mineral, and energy resources, including research and monitoring of fish, wildlife, and vegetation.
In the president’s budget request, as a whole, the U.S. Geological Survey receives $983.5 million, a 16.7 percent cut from FY 2019 levels. USGS’ Ecosystems mission area receives $141 million, a 10 percent cut. There are significant changes proposed that would consolidate five existing Ecosystem Programs into three programs: status and trends, fisheries, wildlife, environments and invasive species are rearranged into three new program areas titled species management research, land management research, and biological threats research. It also consolidates research from two Land Resource programs into the Climate Adaptation Science Center line item within Ecosystems. The Cooperative Research Unit program is eliminated. The National Land Imaging sub activity including operation and development of Landsat satellites and ground systems is moved over to the Core Science System mission area.
The USGS Coalition, of which ESA is a member, submitted testimony urging appropriators to provide $1.2 billion to USGS in FY 2020. ESA also submitted testimony requesting that Congress fully examine the proposed Ecosystem mission reorganization for unintended consequences.
The House appropriations bill includes $1.2 billion for USGS, a 4.6% increase over FY2019 levels. House appropriators rejected the agency’s request to restructure its divisions, stating that the proposed changes “reduce program and funding transparency.” The bill increases funding for the Cooperative Research units from $18.3 million in FY2019 to $24 million. The Trump administration proposed eliminating these units in previous budget requests. The House also increases funding for another program targeted for significant reductions in the president’s budget request – the USGS Climate Adaption Centers receive a $13 million increase, including $4 million to establish a Midwest Climate Adaption Science Center.
On the House floor, lawmakers approved an amendment prohibiting the USGS from limiting the use of climate modeling tools.
The Senate Appropriations bill provides $1.209 billion for the USGS, a 4.22% increase. Senators approve USGS’ plan to restructure its mission areas. In this reorganization, the agency’s Climate Adaption Science Centers and the agency’s environmental health research programs are moved to the Ecosystems Mission Area. The Climate Adaption Science Centers and the Cooperative Research Units receive flat funding at FY 2019 levels. The appropriations committee report instructs that this funding should be used to keep all Climate Science Adaptation Centers open. USGS proposed closing the cooperative research units and consolidating the eight regional Climate Adaption Science Centers into three regional hubs in its 2020 budget request.
The FY19 president’s budget would cut USGS funding by 21 percent, from $1.1 billion in FY17 to $860 million. Within USGS, the Ecosystems line item faces a 40 percent cut, Land Resources a 31 percent cut, and Water Resources a 23 percent cut. The USGS budget highlight document explains that the budget “prioritizes funding for critical responsibilities and core mission activities and does not request funding for programs more appropriately funded by USGS partners and those having reached milestones allowing research to continue without further USGS support.
The House bill includes $1.2 billion for the U.S. Geological Survey, $19 million more than in FY 2018. The bill includes funding for the Landsat-9 satellite program. The Senate bill keeps USGS’ budget flat, relative to FY2018 levels.
The president’s budget proposed cutting funding for the USGS by $163 million, or 15 percent, to $922 million.
ESA asked Congress to fund USGS at $1.2 billion for FY 2018.
The FY2017 omnibus funding bill provides $1.1 billion for USGS, $63 million above FY 2017. It directs USGS to target critical infrastructure investments in natural hazards programs, stream gages, the groundwater monitoring network, and mapping activities
The omnibus bill includes $1.1 billion for the USGS, $23 million above the FY 2016 enacted level. Funding is targeted to programs dealing with natural hazards, stream gages, the groundwater monitoring network, and mapping activities. Also, within the total, the bill includes $10 million and fully funds “Landsat 9” – a satellite program that provides land use measurements that are important to local communities for agriculture, forestry, energy, and water resource decisions.
The USGS Ecosystems account is funded for FY 2017 at $159.7 million, which is a $500,000 cut from FY 2016.
The Climate and Land Use Change account is funded at $149.27 million, which is a $9.3 million increase over FY 2016, mainly for land remote sensing. However, the climate variability account within this program is cut by $3.7 million down to $53.58 million in FY 2017.
The National Park Service (NPS) within DOI is responsible for the management of the National Park System. NPS preserves the natural and cultural resources and values of 417 sites covering more than 84 million acres.
The National Park Service receives 2.7 billion, a 16 percent cut in the President’s 2020 budget request.
NPS receives 3.39 billion in the House appropriations bill, a 5% increase.
In the Senate bill, NPS receives 3.36 billion, a 4.26% increase.
The FY19 president’s budget proposes a less severe reduction to NPS funding than it did in FY18, cutting it 7 percent to $2.7 billion.
The House bill increases NPS’ budget by $53 million to $3.2 5 billion. The Senate funds NPS at $3.21 billion.
The president’s budget proposed reducing the NPS budget by 13 percent to $2.55 billion.
The FY2018 omnibus funds the National Park Service at 3.2 billion, an increase of $255 million above FY 2017.
The legislation provides $2.9 billion for NPS, an increase of $81 million above the FY 2016 level. This funding provides targeted increases for park operations and maintenance to help reduce the maintenance backlog and addresses other priorities related to the Park Service’s centennial anniversary.
The Environmental Protection Agency is a federal agency that exists to protect human health and the environment. The EPA writes regulations that implement environmental laws, sets and enforces environmental standards, educates the public about the environment, and works through partnerships to address environmental issues. In addition, nearly half of the agency’s budget goes to grants that support studies and projects at state environmental programs, non-profits, and educational institutions. The EPA’s Office of Research and Development conducts critical scientific research, studying environmental issues at laboratories across the country and developing ways to address environmental problems.
The EPA receives a 31 percent cut in the President’s 2020 budget request, bringing the agency’s total budget to $6.1 billion. Science and Technology programs would receive a 35 percent cut. The budget proposes cutting almost every EPA program and would cut hundreds of jobs from the agency. An EPA Budget-in-Brief document sets a cap of 12,415 full-time employees. The agency’s current full-time employee ceiling is 14,376.
The budget proposal highlights and prioritizes the agency’s regulatory rollbacks, including the Affordable Clean Energy rule, the Trump administration’s replacement for the Clean Power Plan and the proposed redefinition of the Waters of the U.S.
As in past years, funding for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative and the Chesapeake Bay Program is cut by 90 percent. However, EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler told lawmakers that the administration would reverse its proposal to cut funding for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative by 90% after President Trump said that he would fully fund the program at $300 million during a rally in Michigan. Other geographic clean-up programs, including programs targeting the Puget Sound, the San Francisco Bay and the Gulf of Mexico are eliminated.
ESA submitted testimony supporting $746 million for Science and Technology programs with the EPA.
The House bill provides $9.53 billion, an 18% increase over FY 2019 levels. The Senate bill provides 9.011 billion, a nearly 12% increase.
In the Senate bill, the EPA’s science and the science and technology programs are funded at $713 million, around a 1% increase. Again, Senate appropriators reject a proposal from the administration to cut the agency’s regional cleanup programs by 90%. The Great Lakes Restoration Initiative receives $301 million, a 1% increase and the Chesapeake Bay Program receives $76 million, a $3 million increase.
* Science and Technology and Environmental Programs & Management were both subject to rescissions for FY 2017. The number shown is the net appropriation. S&T was funded at $713.8 million with a $7.4 million rescission, and EPM at $2619.8 million offset by a $21.8 million rescission
* In the president’s FY18 and FY19 budgets, programs and line items that previously included climate no longer do. For example, “Clean Air and Climate” is only “Clean Air.”
The president’s FY19 budget, as in FY18, proposes considerable reductions to EPA funding, in many cases similar in magnitude to those in the president’s FY18 proposal. Overall EPA funding would be cut 24 percent to $6.1 billion, and EPA Science & Technology would be cut by 36 percent. Geographic programs, such as Great Lakes Restoration, that were eliminated in the FY18 president’s budget are reduced by 91 percent in this year’s.
According to agency documents, this budget “provides the direction and resources to return the EPA to its core mission of protecting human health and the environment.” It establishes three new strategic goals related to the core mission, cooperative federalism, and the rule of law and process.
The Senate bill keeps EPA funding flat at $8.058 billion. The House bill cuts the EPA budget by $100 million $7.958 billion. The Great Lakes Restoration Initiative also retains funding.
The president’s budget proposed cutting the agency’s funding by 31.4 percent, the largest reduction for any cabinet-level agency. These cuts would have reduced the agency’s overall budget from $8.1 billion to $5.7 billion, and it would have cut EPA Science & Technology funding by 36 percent compared to net FY 2017 appropriations.
The agency received flat funding in FY2018 with a total budget of $8.1 billion. While the operational budget remains about the same, EPA regulatory programs would be reduced, and grant programs would be increased.
EPA’s overall funding saw a small increase of 1 percent, to $8.06 billion for FY 2017. Congress stipulated in the bill that within one month the EPA must provide in detail its operating plan of how the agency plans to allocate funds at the program project level. The bill also notes that workforce levels are below the FY 2016 level; therefore, the agreement includes rescissions in the Science and Technology and Environmental Programs and Management accounts that capture expected savings associated with such changes. A rescission allows Congress to revoke budget authority previously enacted by law.
Even with the rescission, the Science and Technology Program (S&T) is cut by just under 3.8 percent to $706 million for FY 2017. The $28.2 million in cuts are primarily to research accounts for national priorities, water resources, and sustainable and healthy communities. The S&T Clean Air and Climate program is flat-funded at $116.5 million.
The Environmental Programs and Management account receives $2.597 billion in FY 2017, which is a $15.68 million cut from FY 2016 funding, primarily from rescission. FY 2017 spending includes $435.8 million for Geographic Programs, which is an $8.1 million increase over FY 2016 for the Gulf of Mexico and the Long Island Sound. It also flat funds the Brownfields program at $25.59. This program’s Clean Air and Climate account receives $273.1 million, flat funded when compared with FY 2016 funding. The Water Ecosystems: Estuary and Wetlands account receives $47.78 million, equal to FY 2016 funding.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), within the Department of Commerce, is a scientific agency that focuses on the conditions of the oceans and the atmosphere. NOAA conducts research that helps understand and predict changes in climate, weather, oceans, and coasts. The agency also works to conserve and manage coastal and marine ecosystems and resources. Research conducted by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration promotes habitat restoration efforts for our nation’s coasts and wetlands while simultaneously preserving biodiversity and conserving the scenic beauty for some of our nation’s most treasured areas. In addition, NOAA supports and coordinated educational activities to enhance public awareness and understanding of ocean-related issues.
The president’s budget request includes $4.5 billion for NOAA, a 17% cut. This includes a 10% cut to the National Marine Fisheries Service and a 41% cut for the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric research.
As in previous years, the president’s budget proposes eliminating several “lower priority” programs, including Sea Grant, Coastal Zone Management Grants, and the Pacific Coastal Salmon Recovery Fund.
The House appropriations bill includes $5.48 billion for NOAA, a $54 million dollar increase. This bill passed the full House in June 2019. The National Marine Fisheries Service receives a 4% increase. Defying the administration request for a 40% cut, the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric research receive a 13% increase, including a 17% increase for climate research.
On the House floor, lawmakers approved amendments reserving $1.5 million for North Atlantic right whale monitoring and research and another $3 million for harmful algal bloom research.
The Senate bill provides 5.337 billion overall for NOAA, a 1.62% decrease. Within this amount, NOAA’s research division receives a 1.17% increase and the National Sea Grant College Program’s funding is increased by $7 million from $68 million to $75 million.
The proposed NOAA budget for FY19 reflects many of the cuts proposed in the president’s FY18 budget. The overall budget is cut by 20 percent, while the National Ocean Service would face a 27 percent cut, National Marine Fisheries Service a 5 percent cut, and the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research a 38 percent reduction.
The funding cuts also reduce a number of NOAA programs, including external grant programs, arctic research, and marine observations. The National Sea Grant College Program would be eliminated, a cut that was also proposed in FY18.
In FY2019 House bill, NOAA is funded at $5.2 billion, $751 million less than FY 2018 levels. NOAA cuts largely come from a decrease in spending for weather satellite procurement and the completion of the acquisition of a Hurricane Hunter aircraft. The National Ocean Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service are both receive one percent cut and the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric research is cut by 8 percent. The bill cuts funding for NOAA’s climate research program by 38 percent, from $158 million in FY 2018 to $99 million.
In the Senate bill, NOAA receives $5.48 billion, a $426 billion decrease from FY 2018.
The president’s budget proposed a 16 percent reduction in NOAA’s funding, cutting its budget to $4.8 billion. The National Ocean Service budget would have been cut by 26 percent, National Marine Fisheries Service by 4 percent, and the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research by 32 percent.
ESA asked Congress to fund NOAA at $6.1 billion for FY 2018.
In the FY2018 omnibus bill, NOAA is funded at $5.9 billion, $234 million above FY 2017 levels. Funding targets priorities included the National Weather Service, fisheries management, weather research, and ocean exploration. Climate research remains flat funded at $158 million, while ocean, coastal, and great lakes is increased by $12 million for a total of $206 million.
The FY 2017 $5.675 billion appropriation is a slight decrease in overall spending. Most of the decrease is within the National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service. Programs of particular importance to the ecological community are NOAA’s Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR), the National Ocean Service (NOS), and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). These offices support intramural and extramural research critical to NOAA’s mission of managing marine and coastal resources to meet the nation’s environmental, economic, and social needs.
Funding for NOAA’s Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, which supports critical climate change research across the country, was increased by 3.5 percent, from $462 million to $478 million. This office supports laboratories and programs across the U.S. and collaborates with external partners, including 16 NOAA-funded Cooperative Institutes and 33 Sea Grant Institutions, which is funded at $63 million for FY 2017. OAR climate research for FY 2017 is funded at $158 million, which is exactly the same as FY 2016 funding. Ocean, Coastal, and Great Lakes Research is funded at $192.8 million, which is a 2.2 percent increase over FY 2016.
NOS is funded at $517.4 million for FY 2017. The NOS account for Coastal Science and Assessment is funded at $82.6 million. NMFS is funded at $851.5 million, which includes funds for protected resources science and management such as marine mammals and salmon populations.
The National Science Foundation (NSF) is the primary federal funding source for the ecological research community. NSF allocates 90 percent of its research funding through a merit review process as grants or cooperative agreements to individual researchers and groups at colleges, universities, academic consortia, nonprofit institutions, and small business. It is the only federal agency that supports research in all scientific fields.
NSF awards reach over 2,000 colleges, universities, and other public and private institutions across the country, and the agency provides critical funding for Science, Technology, Mathematics, and Engineering (STEM) education programs.
NSF’s Biological Sciences Directorate is the primary federal funding sources for basic biological research at US colleges and universities. Its research disciplines include botany, zoology, microbiology, ecology, basic molecular and cellular biology, and other fields that enhance understanding of the natural world and contribute to the development of sustainable solutions to environmental challenges.
The presidents’ budget provides $7.1 billion for the National Science Foundation, a 12 percent cut. Congress provides top level NSF funding and the agency sets the budget for each Directorate based on research priorities and input from the scientific community. The Coalition for National Science Funding, of which ESA is a member, is requesting that Congress provide $9 billion for NSF in FY 2020.
NSF’s budget request includes $756.6 million for the BIO directorate, a 9.7% cut from FY 2018 levels. At this funding level, NSF predicts that BIO’s funding rate for research grants will decrease from 24% in FY 2018 to 21% in 2020. The number of people involved in BIO activities will shrink from 13,764 in FY 2018 to 12,400 in FY 2020, including 291 fewer graduate students and 365 fewer senior researchers. The Division of Environmental Biology receives $141.7 million, an 8.6% cut.
The request includes a 7.8% cut to the National Ecological Observatory Network from FY 2018.
The House appropriations bill includes $8.64 billion for NSF, a 7% increase over FY2019 levels, and $7.1 billion for NSF’s research and related activities account, an 8.9% increase. This bill passed the full House in June 2019.
Senate appropriators allocated $8.317 billion for NSF, a 3% increase. This amount includes $6.732 billion, a 3.7% increase for NSF’s Research and Related Activities account, which funds most NSF grants.
In total, Senate appropriators provide around $105 million for midscale research infrastructure, including $75 million for research infrastructure that costs between $20 million and $70 million. Funding midscale research infrastructure is one of NSF’s 10 big ideas.
Senate appropriators reject NSF’s proposal to decrease the number of Graduate Research Fellowships to 1,600 fellowships in FY 2020 and provide level funding for the Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP), relative to FY 2019 levels. The GRFP typically provides around 2,000 awards a year.
Compared to other science agencies and programs, the president’s proposed FY19 budget for NSF is not nearly as severe. While the original budget would have reduced NSF funding by 29 percent, cutting it $2.2 billion from $7.5 to $5.3 billion, the addendum accounting for increased budget caps restored this reduction. As a result, NSF would receive flat funding in FY19 when compared to FY17 enacted levels. NSF Research & Related Activities would in fact receive a 2 percent increase. The FY19 budget for Major Research Equipment & Facilities Construction, on the other hand, would be cut 55 percent, from $209 million in FY17 to $95 million. However, this decrease for this account is largely due to the support for two new Regional Class Research Vessels. The decrease for the Agency Operations & Award Management is largely due to the completion of the construction of and relocation to the new NSF headquarters.
In the House bill, NSF receives $8.175 billion in total, including $6.85 billion for research and related activities, a five percent increase over FY 2018. NSF’s major research and research construction account receives a 47 percent increase, including $127 million for three new research vessels. The appropriations report notes that NSF should not allocate less than FY 2018 levels to support existing research infrastructure such as academic research vessels and observational networks.
The Senate bill includes $8.1 billion for NSF. This includes $6.485 for NSF’s research and related activities account – a 4 percent increase, this include the Biological Science Directorate. The bill also provides $95 million to update research facilities at McMurdo Station in Antarctica and and $89.2 million for three Regional Class Research Vessels.
The president’s FY18 budget proposed an 11 percent cut to the NSF budget, reducing funding to $6.65 billion.
ESA asked Congress to fund NSF at $8 billion for FY 2018, which would represent a 4% increase, adjusted for inflation, over FY 2016 enacted levels. ESA also urged Congress not to fund the agency by directorate, but rather to continue funding NSF research and related activities overall and allowing the agency to direct resources as necessary.
The omnibus funds NSF at $7.77 billion, $295 million above FY 2017.
- Research and Related Activities: $6.33 billion, $301 million above FY 2017. Details on how funding will be allocated among directorates are not yet available.
- Major Research Equipment and Construction: $182.8 million
- Education and Human Resources: $902 million
- Agency Operations and Award Management: $328.5 million
- National Science Board: $4.370 million
- Office of Inspector General: $15.2 million
Funding for NSF saw a minute increase of $9 million for its Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction (MREFC) account to begin construction of three regional-class research vessels. Otherwise, the overall funding for the remainder of FY 2017 is flat when compared with FY 2016 levels at $7.47 billion. This includes the research account, which is funded for a total of $5.97 billion.
Sources: An American Budget – President’s Budget FY 2019, Addendum to the President’s FY19 Budget to Account for the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, 2017 Omnibus Appropriations Bill, An Ecologist’s Guidebook to Policy Engagement, AAAS Guide to the President’s Budget, AIP Federal Science Budget Tracker, USGS Coalition Testimony Regarding FY2017 Budget, “America First: A Budget Blueprint to Make America Great Again,” Washington Post, Politico, websites and budget justifications of the following agencies: Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, US Forest Service, USFWS, DOI, USGS, DOE Office of Science
ESA’s policy activities work to infuse ecological knowledge into national policy decisions through activities such as policy statements, Capitol Hill briefings, Congressional Visits Days and coalition involvement. Policy News Updates are bi-monthly summaries of major environmental and science policy news. They are produced by the Public Affairs Office of the Ecological Society of America.
Visit the ESA website to learn more about our activities and membership.