August 3-8, 2003. Savannah International Trade & Convention Center, Savannah, Georgia

Evaluation and acceptance. Accuracy and appearance of the abstract are the responsibility of the author(s). ABSTRACTS WILL BE RETURNED IF THEY DO NOT COMPLY PRECISELY WITH THE GUIDELINES, INCLUDING FORMAT. Content will also be evaluated. Policies similar to those of ESA October 2002 journals with respect to originality and aptness will be followed. The presentations must be based on NEW, previously unpublished material. Reviews of past work are generally not permissible outside of symposia or other special sessions; in such cases, a new analysis or synthesis is expected. Although it is understood that many abstracts will be submitted before all analysis and conclusions are in their final form, it is not acceptable to submit an abstract if the authors have no substantial results in hand. The abstract must be clear that the authors will present substantial and SPECIFIC information. The major cause of rejection of abstracts is lack of evidence of quantitative or substantive results. Clarity of stated objectives and results of research and appropriateness of subject material are also considered.