ESA Policy News, January 17, 2014: budget relief, enviro-ed grants, and a toxic spill in WV
Jan17

ESA Policy News, January 17, 2014: budget relief, enviro-ed grants, and a toxic spill in WV

APPROPRIATIONS: congress passes FY 2014 spending bill
TOXIC SUBSTANCES: West Virginia spill sparks chemical safety policies review
WHITE HOUSE: OSTP director Holdren explains ‘polar vortex’ via Youtube
USGS: Kimball nominated as new director
GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS: ESA weighs in on federal employee conference attenance
EPA: environmental education grant applications accepted
POLICY ENGAGEMENT: ESA announces 2014 GSPA recipients
FWS: wildlife refuges to offer free days in 2014

Read More

Weighing the long-term implications of mountaintop removal mining

The practice of mountaintop removal mining has spurred a great deal of research and policy debate since January of this year, when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) vetoed a federal permit for the 2,278 acre Spruce No. 1 mine in Logan County, West Virginia. The veto of the permit was EPA’s 13th use of its veto authority, granted under the Clean Water Act (Public Law 92-500). In the practice of mountaintop removal mining, upper elevation forests are cleared and stripped of topsoil and explosives are used to break up rocks to access buried coal. Excess rock (“mine spoil”) is pushed into adjacent valleys where it buries existing streams. Surface mining is currently the dominant driver of land-use change in the Appalachian region. Industry advocates and regional lawmakers describe the practice as having important economic benefits for the region. At the same time, a great deal of scientific research has called into question whether the long-term ecological and human health consequences of mountain top removal mining outweigh the short-term economic benefits. A recent study by West Virginia University and Washington State University scientists found a correlation between areas of mountain top removal mining and birth defects of local residents. The researchers used government data on almost two million birth records from mining sites in Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia. The study notes that, even after accounting for socioeconomic risks, the correlation persists—making it increasingly likely that water and air pollution were dominant factors. The study specifically found that areas with the most substantial environmental disturbances corresponded with the greatest incidents of birth defects. The study does concede a number of other factors may play a role, such as underreporting of maternal smoking and drinking. In May, EPA also released two studies on the effects of mountain top removal mining in Appalachian states. The first study found that streams were “permanently lost with the removal of the mountain and from burial under mining waste.” It also found increased levels of selenium and other pollutants near mining sites that can have detrimental impacts on wildlife in the area. The second study, focusing on water conductivity, found that high levels of conductivity are associated with a loss of aquatic life. On Capitol Hill, EPA’s veto has been met with sharp criticism among senior congressional Republicans, the mining industry and West Virginia lawmakers (among both political parties). Mining advocates claim EPA’s actions serve to stifle job creation in the region amidst an already fragile economy. Both of the West Virginia Senators, Joe Manchin (D) and Jay Rockefeller (D) are opposed to EPA’s action—the latter having sent a letter to the President criticizing the...

Read More