<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perspectives on Policy from ESA&#8217;s President, Norm Christensen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.esa.org/egwash/the-ecologist-goes-to-washington-perspectives-on-policy-from-esa%e2%80%99s-president-norm-christensen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.esa.org/egwash/the-ecologist-goes-to-washington-perspectives-on-policy-from-esa%e2%80%99s-president-norm-christensen/</link>
	<description>The Ecologist Goes to Washington features the stories and reflections of scientists who have engaged their local, state, or federal governments in addressing the broader implications of their research.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:01:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Vandeman</title>
		<link>http://www.esa.org/egwash/the-ecologist-goes-to-washington-perspectives-on-policy-from-esa%e2%80%99s-president-norm-christensen/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Vandeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esa.org/egwash/?p=16#comment-48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists claim to value science, but their choice of what to study is very subjective, thereby biasing the results. For example, I don&#039;t think there is much research on human-free habitat. The concept doesn&#039;t even exist outside a few people like me. Nor is there any acknowledgement of humans as an exotic species. Mention of humans in the context of exotic species is conspicuously absent! I also haven&#039;t seen much on the abuse of science, such as the fact that so-called &quot;researchers&quot; on mountain biking impacts deliberately misrepresent their results, in order to promote their hobby. Do you know of anyone doing these kinds of work?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientists claim to value science, but their choice of what to study is very subjective, thereby biasing the results. For example, I don&#8217;t think there is much research on human-free habitat. The concept doesn&#8217;t even exist outside a few people like me. Nor is there any acknowledgement of humans as an exotic species. Mention of humans in the context of exotic species is conspicuously absent! I also haven&#8217;t seen much on the abuse of science, such as the fact that so-called &#8220;researchers&#8221; on mountain biking impacts deliberately misrepresent their results, in order to promote their hobby. Do you know of anyone doing these kinds of work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
